Search for: "Sanchez v. Sanchez"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In Sanchez v The Department of Education of the City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00954, the Appellate Division held that Sanchez, the petitioner in this CPLR Article 78 action, was not entitled to the restoration of his tenure upon his return from resignation as he failed to provide 30 days' notice of his resignation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:27 pm
Maria Theresa Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:04 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
Sanchez Valle. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm
The process of adjusting status in the United States is very complex, requiring the careful analysis and attention of an experienced and skilled immigration attorney. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:40 am
This case is very beneficial. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:41 am
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Sanchez v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Ralph’s Grocery Company (2011) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (2nd Dist., B222689) and Sanchez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Walker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 10:45 am
v=klqOPo_TuFU MINUTO 8.13) luego, sin pedir disculpas y como si no hubiera pasado nada, "INFORMA" que no se han nombrado los representantes sin explicar que está pasando.Hoy, a este DESINFORMADOR no le preocupa la existencia de dos Asociaciones que se disputan la representación de los fonavistas, jejeje!!! [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Cato@Liberty: A Response to Orin Kerr on GPS Tracking by Julian Sanchez: Orin Kerr—easily one of our most lucid thinkers when it comes to applying the Fourth Amendment to new technologies—argues at Volokh Conspiracy that, while it’s a hard call whether the installation of a GPS tracking device to a vehicle counts as a Fourth Amendment “search” or “seizure,” the Supreme Court should not treat the use of such devices as a search when it decides… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
At CATO@Liberty, Julian Sanchez responds to Orin Kerr’s preview of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:16 am
SENTENCING/STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm
”) United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
In Sanchez-Lllamas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
In 2000, the Supreme Court said in Buckhannon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:37 pm
The majority opinion clings to Wyman v. [read post]
