Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
At all times relevant hereto, the Defendants were manufacturers and sellers of the adulterated food product that is the subject of the action. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am
Accordingly, the court held the buyer could not recover from the auctioneer.Cases like this highlight the importance of disclaimers by sellers and of due diligence by buyers.Twitter Issues Subpoenas in Dispute with Elon MuskThe Wall Street Journal quoted me in an article about the Twitter v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:57 pm
"] In Iancu v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Serova v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Serova v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
(Rezec v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
But the rightsholder asserted its rights against dashboard stickers without the background, including sending repeated takedown notices to Amazon targeting a rival seller. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
The absence of covenants explains the parties’ focus on good will and Justice Borrok’s reliance on the Court of Appeals’ 1981 opinion in Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler holding, on the one hand, that the seller of a company including its good will has an implied duty not to engage in solicitation impairing the company’s good will and, on the other hand, the seller has no general non-compete duty absent express agreement. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith, Brief for Respondents [PDF] — Goldsmith’s counsel this week filed its merits brief in the closely-watched Supreme Court copyright case. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:56 am
QYK Brands LLC d/b/a Glowwy and FTC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Accordingly, the panel affirmed the dismissal by the district court (Einhorn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 7:42 am
See State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
” Garr v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:22 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Court of Appeals Rules That a Timely Filed Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Can Recover All Damages, No Matter How Long Ago They Occurred First off today, Stephen Carlisle at NOVA Southern University reports that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in the Starz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:20 am
Frydco Capital Group, LLC v Carlton Fields, P.A. [read post]
