Search for: "State v. Advertiser Co., Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 1,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Another favorite was BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
LegalZoom.com, Inc., 802 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:28 am
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
On January 17, 2012, the Second Circuit granted Clorox’s motion for expedited appeal in the cat litter case (Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
July 3, 2003); Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:31 am
Prairie Oil & Gas Co., 274 U.S. 684 (1927). [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:32 pm
Cir. 2015) (concluding claims related to tailoring advertisements according to the time of day were directed to an abstract idea because that practice had been“long-practiced in our society”); buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:44 am
DotStrategy Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:33 am
South Beach Beverage Co., Inc., 2012 WL 1893818 (C.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Laurette Co., Inc., No. 08 Civ. 5065 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Laurette Co., Inc., No. 08 Civ. 5065 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]