Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 201 - 220 of 8,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 2:36 pm by immigrationprof
Holder No. 06-71565 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by immigrationprof
Holder No 07-74277 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 am by firstamendmentblogger
Holder, which presents the following questions: (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public... [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
Holder Issue: Whether a person convicted under state law for simple drug possession (a... [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:36 am by immigrationprof
From guest blogger, Professor Evelyn Cruz, Arizona State University: Sholla v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:49 pm by immigrationprof
Holder United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No 10-70087 (January 4, 2011) Facts: Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
Holder, taking up the question whether Congress violated the First Amendment when it granted copyright protection to certain foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:03 pm by Evan Brown
Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm by Florian Mueller
But in case he hasn't noticed, the Netherlands is not the 51st state of the United States but a member state of the European Union.In the EU, however,the standard is different. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm
The federal law also says "knowingly" whereas the state law doesn't use that same word. [read post]