Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 201 - 220
of 29,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Whether, in light of this Court’s prior precedents, particularly State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:16 pm
In light of the express reservation in Coleman, the doctrine is pretty indeterminate. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 1:55 pm
I'll say nothing about substantive about today's Ninth Circuit opinion other than simply making a prediction:My money's on the United States Supreme Court GVRing the case in light of the ultimate opinion in Fernandez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
From National Law Review: On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) struck down Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
In Tidwell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
With respect to F&V, LP stated that it served its first round of discovery requests on September 20, 2011, and F&V did not serve responses until November 2, 2011. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:08 pm
In Gospel Light Mennonite Church Medical Aid Plan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment, but the Supreme Court subsequently granted Voisine’s petition for certiorari, vacated the First Circuit’s judgment, and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of the intervening 2014 Supreme Court decision United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm
We interrupt the week’s Snowden-related coverage with this tiny reminder: at 9 a.m. tomorrow, hearings resume in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
State. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Tannenbaum also stated that Shantou and F&V’s new counsel, Locke Lord, had indicated that it would oppose the motion – but the order states that Locke Lord later withdrew its opposition. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Lane in 2004 and United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Tang v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 5:31 am
Here: F069302A An excerpt: After deciding California law empowers the Governor to concur, the Supreme Court transferred this case back to us with directions to vacate our decision and reconsider the matter in light of United Auburn. [read post]
