Search for: "State v. Mark T. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 2:29 am by Russ Bensing
Last week’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  Ms Hindley… denied any wrongdoing regarding Ms Smith and said the ‘alleged markings’ four months later had never been reported to her. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Venkat
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
But you should ask yourself, and your students, how that principle stands along the Court's decision in Barbra Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am by Nadia Kayyali
Related Issues: NSA SpyingPATRIOT ActRelated Cases: Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
After Mark breaking post, here's our own Neil's insightful piece on that happy-ending story.* The final curtain in the GOLDBEAR sagaThe word "end" in the Haribo v Lindt golden chocolate bear litigation (see IPKat posts here, hereand here) has just been put by German Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Ltd v Parle Agro Pvt. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am by Emily Dai
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit proceedings for the case Trump v. [read post]