Search for: "State v. Solomon" Results 201 - 220 of 475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2009, 1:46 pm
" Unfazed by the court's decision, the plaintiffs' lawyer Louis Solomon (Proskauer Rose LLP) stated that it was not "going to limit" the case. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:01 pm by Evan M. Levow
Police have the burden, however, of providing a driver with a “meaningful opportunity” to comply with a request for testing, as the court held in Solomon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:20 pm
The court followed Matter of Settlement Capital Corp v Yates 12 Misc 3d 1198(A) in stating that "fair and reasonable were to be evaluated on a case by case basis and the totality of the circumstances". [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Dodd-Frank.com blog discusses the SDNY’s recent decision in Perez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Chester Willcox    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusThe Honorable Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:06 am
The Court's unanimous decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 3:11 am
State, Patrick Charles Hannon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
I would not have been surprised if this little statutory case had been a letdown after the constitutional concerns with which the justices began their morning in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:42 pm
Witness the decision of the First Department of New York's Appellate Division in Speranza v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:07 pm
  Solomon points to the case of   Dr. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:12 pm
  Solomon points to the case of   Dr. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]