Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm
The New York Times' "Square Feet" column today posted "Lessons on Limits of Eminent Domain at Columbia," about the recent decision in Kaur v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
Russell presents the Supreme Court with its first opportunity to squarely apply J. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:00 am
See Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:47 am
Enter Houchin v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
By taking out the extra walls, the square footage and value of the project increased. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
This Indiana trademark litigation, Family Express Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
This Indiana trademark litigation, Family Express Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
This case illustrates how it all shakes out.The case is Dowrich-Weeks v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
The question squarely presented in that grant is whether the Medicaid expansion that is part of the optimistically named "Affordable Care Act" is void because it is coercive, under the framework established by South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
