Search for: "Steve McConnell" Results 201 - 220 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 7:42 am by Raffaela Wakeman
A retired CIA officer, Steve Stormoen, supervised this “ghosting” program even after CIA lawyers prohibited the agency from handling its own interrogations. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
  Friend of the blog Steve McConnell of the Drug & Device Law Blog emailed us: “You guys did a great post on the passing of Clarence Clemons. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
Steve McConnell writes a post for the Drug and Device Lawyer Blog about an angry liar of a plaintiffs' lawyer who keeps hitting 8-figure verdicts and settlements. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
Steve McConnell writes a post for the Drug and Device Lawyer Blog about an angry liar of a plaintiffs' lawyer who keeps hitting 8-figure verdicts and settlements. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:25 pm by Sandy Levinson
Both Steve Calabresi and I (and many others) support 18-year-term limits for Supreme Court justices. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:46 am by CivPro Blogger
Steve McConnell at the Drug and Device Law Blog has a post about the practice of joining corporate employees to a lawsuit for the purpose of creating or destroying diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by Bruce Nye
  If you want to see what good blogging can look like, check out this post by Steve McConnell on the problem of documents produced in confidence, or this one on the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:57 am by Bexis
  Hence our current line-up of regular contributors:  Bexis, the sole surviving son of the original blog, Steve McConnell, Will Sachse, and Dave Walk (anybody can access our bios in the right-hand margin). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
Supreme Court update: Presiding Justice Sills and Administrative Presiding Justice Judith McConnell: Judge Guilford welcomes Presiding Justice Sills as Steve Kelly looks on: Justice Rylaarsdam and his wife, Jan: Justice Ikola: 4/3 administrator Kevin Stinson and supervising clerk Kathy Rossi: 4/3 research attorneys Kathy Nock, Bill Ball, Richard Helms, and Janice Patronite; appellate lawyer Merritt McKeon: 4/3 research attorney Josie Chow, Jan Rylaarsdam,… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:41 am
Fourth District Administrative Presiding Justice Judith McConnell (right)came up from San Diego to honor Justice Sills, as did Fourth District Clerk/Administrator Steve Kelly and 4/1 managing attorney Kim Stewart. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:58 am by Glenn Reynolds
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Bill McConnell writes: Reading Steve Chapman’s article this morning and several others in the same vein, I am amazed that so many pundits come so close to an important take on all this but never actually say it. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:28 am by Josh Wright
Economist and occasional TOTM guest blogger Steve Salop (Georgetown) recently sent me the following questions spurred by the local debate over Governor McConnell’s proposal to private the retailing of alcoholic beverages: I have my first antitrust class of the semester tomorrow. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
” At Crime and Consequences, Steve Erickson hypothesizes that what the opinions in Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:06 pm by Lawrence Jackson
Mitch McConnell announced the death of the miner during a speech on the Senate floor. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:59 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Steve Schwinn has this to say in his opening comments: Let me... [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
Behind door number two is Steve McConnell. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:54 pm
Steve Calabresi and Michael McConnell are somewhere in between. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 Oh, important conservatives cracked now and then--Judge Bork waffled on Griswold and Professor McConnell wrote a stunningly honest attempt at an originalist justification of Brown v. [read post]