Search for: "The People v. Hoffman"
Results 201 - 220
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
In Barnhill v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:10 pm
The Case of Sandberg v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 5:48 pm
Creech v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:10 am
Hay's cause of action is precluded by Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:12 am
., Hoffman, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:46 am
He is the author of Federal Justice in California: The Court of Ogden Hoffman, 1851-1891 and American Sovereigns: The People and America’s Constitutional Tradition before the Civil War as well as numerous articles on American constitutional and legal history. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am
But Hoffman, with her middle-class background, was in some ways not a typical C.I. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 9:49 pm
See Eugene Volokh's post on Rahmani v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
* Sams v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:58 am
The case was patterned on a highly controversial one, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm
” Parkson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 5:01 am
In his classic concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
As Ramirez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:28 am
” People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
