Search for: "US v. Watkins"
Results 201 - 220
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
Some firms have followed Latham & Watkins's lead and are using the bonus to give back the money that associates lost during last year's salary freeze. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:19 am
Watkins (New Hanover)(Jolly): alleged diversions of funds by former president of company, claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, NC RICO, and unfair and deceptive practices. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
In Wood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
For one, Microsoft and OpenAI, proponents of the “fair use” basis for use of protected works in training, have offered to indemnify customers facing copyright litigation due to their use of Microsoft/OpenAI tools. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
Watkins (which involved restrictions on political participation by dissenters), and Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:09 pm
Nov. 20, 2009)(Green)(premises liability, fatal fall from cliff, recreational use statute)CITY OF WACO v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
Mar. 6, 2017); Watkins v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Baze v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
Bowen Partner Latham & Watkins Joe R. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:35 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Watkins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Devin Watkins writes that the court’s ruling in Gundy v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
From Bell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 7:46 am
This initiative was proposed by the head of the Defense Committee of the Upper House of the Russian Parliament, Víktor Bóndarev, and the head of the Committee for the Defense of the Duma in the Lower Chamber, Vladimir Shamánov. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Even apart from that fundamental flaw, however, this first “off-ramp” argument wouldn’t withstand scrutiny on its own terms, even if this were a case (again: it’s not) where a state were purporting to “enforce” Section 3 by, for example, refusing to allow the winner of an election to enter into state office because she’s disqualified under Section 3, or using a state-law-sanctioned cause of action to remove such a person from the… [read post]
