Search for: "US v. Watkins" Results 201 - 220 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
SARANG DAMLE from Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC represented Ralph Oman. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Edo, No. 06-100, and Safeco Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army – More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday)   US Copyright – Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in ‘Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea’ and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am by Adam Wagner
 That test was set out in the case of  R(Watkins-Singh) v Aberdare High School [2008] EWHC 1865 (Admin), a case in which a sikh girl was found to have been discriminated against for not being allowed to wear a plain steel bangle, a sign of her religion, at school. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:29 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: At Just Enrichment, Michael Kenneally discusses Sorrell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:46 am by Joe Palazzolo
Email us at joe.palazzolo@wsj.com [read post]