Search for: "United States v. Castro"
Results 201 - 220
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 6:31 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Presumably also after your prison term therefor.For better or worse, you've now (again) illegally entered the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
We're happy to welcome them to the site: Babener & Associates, a law firm that represents companies headquartered throughout the United States and abroad. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Castro v Cartwright (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(e)(2) refusal of PROFUMO DE FIRENZE for perfume, finding double entendre: In re Atelier Profumo Artistico Firenze SrL (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms failure-to-function refusal of STRENGTH IN DATA for brochures: In re ImClone Systems Incorporated (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) r [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
Alas, "Havana Club" is also produced in Cuba by a company that benefited when Fidel Castro nationalized private Cuban businesses back in 1960.The question of who owns the rights to Havana Club has become an international sensation embroiling Cuba, the United States, Spain, France, Japan, Nicaragua and the European Union. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
See also Castro v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:07 am
V. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:50 am
We simply think that the rights of ten million vehicle owners and lessees across the United States should not be adjudicated in an action brought by three plaintiffs who cannot show more than the merest possibility of injury to themselves. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Castro, 540 U.S. 375 (2003); and 2) although no notice of the recharacterization would have been required under the rules set out in US v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
For the Court of Appeals' discussion of the legislative intent, Castro v United Container Mach. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:41 am
" United States v. [read post]
