Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Navajo Freight Lines is a classic example. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
Perhaps The Judicial Conference of the United States should do the same for judges. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
An example is a useful discussion between Jamie McGowanand Michael Foranabout how exactly judicial review of rights works on classical premises. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
The Court narrowed the doctrine in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24 (Brief for United States); see also Brief for Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars as Amici Curiae. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:47 am
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court recently issued a fractured decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
’” In their place, we are offered something “new [sic[ and better—a common good constitutionalism grounded in the classical tradition. [read post]
