Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 201 - 220
of 34,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2025, 8:13 am
United States, the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision holding that Congress may limit the president’s authority to remove members of the FTC without good cause. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:04 am
That bellwether--diversity, equity, and inclusion, along with its ecologies of academic theorization, modalities of operationalization, and general approaches to the cognition of society, the state, and their ideal form--remains at the forefront of the political expression of the administration of Presidents Biden and Trump. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 7:45 am
How are “global” law firms (v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:51 am
In DOJ’s view, Klamath did not apply “the Ninth Circuit’s more general test that disqualified an outside party due to the existence of a self-interest alone. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:22 am
It argued the mechanism violated Article I of the Constitution, which provides that “all legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 4:58 pm
Richardson moved on to become the Attorney General of the United States during Nixon’s second term and became known for resigning instead of carrying out Nixon’s order to fire Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:58 pm
United States, No. 21-568, 2025 WL 731834 (Fed. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:00 pm
JGG v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 11:51 am
Thaler submitted a copyright registration application for "A Recent Entrance to Paradise" to the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 10:39 am
’” Off. of Commc’n of United Church of Christ v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 8:40 am
The settlement says: subdivisions (a)(3), (a)(4)(A), and (a)(5) of California Business and Professions Code section 22677 violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution facially and as applied to Plaintiff The state also must pay X $345,576 to cover its challenge costs. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Because it found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their challenge, and the balance of equities tipped in their favor, the court enjoined the enforcement of these portions of the executive orders anywhere in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:25 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 4:10 am
In Talbott v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:22 am
The panelists were Lucian Simmons, the Head of Provenance Research at The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Jane Levine, a founder of The ArtRisk Group; Edward Diskant, Co-Head of the Global White-Collar and Government Investigations Practice at McDermott Will & Emery LLP; Noah Solowiejczyk, Co-Chief of the Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit at the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York; and Anna Rubin, Director of the Holocaust… [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 10:00 pm
I don’t know whether Missouri’s attorney general reads TLB, but on the eve of trial Missouri changed the legal basis for its hoarding claim from common-law tort to federal and state antitrust law. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:32 pm
See generally Thompson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm
Then, on June 29, your general counsel said such efforts should be curtailed or abandoned. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:01 pm
United States, which bolstered the power of the presidency and established that the president is generally immune from criminal prosecution for official acts. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:01 pm
United States, which bolstered the power of the presidency and established that the president is generally immune from criminal prosecution for official acts. [read post]
