Search for: "United States v. Grace" Results 201 - 220 of 656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2018, 11:45 am by FM Librarian
Citizen (The Asylumist, Aug. 2018) [text]Cities, States Resist — and Assist — Immigration Crackdown in New Ways (Pew's Stateline Blog, Aug. 2018) [text]DHS Spins the Border Numbers… Again (Just Security Blog, Aug. 2018) [text]DHS to Restart Deportation Cases for Hundreds of Thousands of Immigrants (Immigration Impact, Aug. 2018) [text]Grace v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:49 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a terse written Order in Grace v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Also on 1798.140(c)(1), once a business clears one of the thresholds, the law doesn’t provide any further grace period for compliance and the business must instantly comply with the entire law. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
  In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
  In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:05 am by Dennis Crouch
A United States patent secures a private property right to an inventor. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:28 pm
(Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia,  supra, pp. 41-42).Anwar had also sought to use the language of religion and corruption against Mahatir, but lost in the end. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
But those are just statutory exemptions, created as a matter of legislative grace. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]