Search for: "United States v. Hasting" Results 201 - 220 of 472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:10 am by Beth Graham
  In her research paper, Professor Mullenix discusses the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Atlantic Marine. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:26 am by Tracy Thomas
Women and girls in the United States are at high risk of experiencing sexual assault and violence perpetrated by an intimate. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am by Eric Turkewitz
Katz to state on the record he would no longer practice ”medical-legal” examinations, repeatedly berated Dr, Katz, stating that “his career was over,” and even stated that defendants’ counsel wanted to “tear [Dr. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by Jen Reynolds
The abstract: Virtually every criminal conviction in the United States is the result of a guilty plea, not a jury trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
Lefstin, University of California Hastings College of the Law, has posted Inventive Application: A History. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]