Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 201 - 220 of 1,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (3d Cir., Dec. 12, 2014), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's claim that a correctional officer's pat down search of his genital area violated his free exercise rights because his religion prohibits homosexual activity.In Goninan v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:05 am by Ben Rubin
In a recent decision out of Oregon, a United States District Court found that plaintiffs do not need to prove a likelihood of future take to prevail on a Section 9 claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
  The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:58 pm by NARF
United States (Trust Responsibilities; Continuing Claims Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
Hoppe observes an abrasive attitude by the United States Supreme Court in its recent Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of OregonState v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Gary L. Francione
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
As Judge McShane of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon wrote in Rummel v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm by David Miller
Matt Salmon (R) recently introduced a bill (pdf) that would remove several western states from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and move them to a proposed, to-be-created Twelfth Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:41 am by Paul Weiland
In a case with a complicated procedural history, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon recently held (pdf) that a claim for failure to consult under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) arises under the citizen suit provision of that Act rather than under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]