Search for: "United States v. Ramirez" Results 201 - 220 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Jill Family
Statutory Background Under the INA, lawful permanent residents of the United States are not citizens of the United States, but they hold “green cards” and enjoy the right to live and work in the United States with little restraint compared to other lawful immigration categories. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:42 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
SALMAN PARTNERS, 1401 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 33131; US FEIN 65-0111089 (United States) [SDNT] CARLOS SAIEH Y CIA. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm by Kyle Graham
Not Quite Messerschmidt, But You Get The Idea The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument tomorrow in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
S. 134 (1972), Kramer v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:11 am by South Florida Lawyers
But the judge is not done:  In my view, to affirm what happened here requires that we turn a blind eye to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Code of Judicial Conduct, to say nothing of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida.Ok, but no traffic safety rules were violated, so it's not all bad. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am by Michael DelSignore
If the victim does not wish to testify the government will attempt to admit the 911 calls into evidence, pursuant to case law from the United States Supreme Court, that that allows statements made to a 911 operator to come into evidence without the defendant being given the opportunity to cross-examine the victim under a case known as Davis v. [read post]