Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 201 - 220 of 3,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
But State ownership of patent rightsis not akin to State ownership of water rights, naturaland important concerns of federalism” and rise to thelevel of core sovereign interests. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:41 am by Gene Quinn
On May 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Medtronic v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:29 pm
We've linked above (click on the title to this blog post) the Ninth Circuit's decision and opinion in their April 29th decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District  of New York. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 7:07 am by Gene Quinn
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently declined to institute a CBM review of U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for "the core lawful purpose of self- Page 10 defense" (554 US at 630), rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:14 am by John Steele
  (h/t: Patently-O)  Syllaubs: This purpose of this essay is to provide an early analysis of some of the most substantial law and policy concerns raised by the very recent en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the now famous Therasense v. [read post]