Search for: "United States v. Harry" Results 201 - 220 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United Steel Workers of America threatened a strike at that very time, which would have imperiled steel production at a time when nearly all military weapons required steel. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Angelo Paparelli, Manish Daftari, Oct. 3, 2024 "Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
The First Court of Appeals erred in holding a jury of five was a mandatory alternative to mistrial when the United States Supreme Court has found a jury of five members unconstitutional.2. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial, stating that under Tennessee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm by Bill Marler
Sotir, PhDa Objective:  Turtle-associated salmonellosis was increasingly recognized in the United States during the 1960s, leading to a federal ban in 1975 on the sale of turtles [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:28 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
Yudes’ June, 2013 blog post, he discussed the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm by Rosemary Campagna
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That extension — considerably less than the added thirty days the states had sought — makes it more likely that the case, United States v. [read post]