Search for: "United States v. Levy"
Results 201 - 220
of 965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2014, 1:04 am
The IRS Collections Unit Threatens a Tax Levy In Budish, the taxpayer owed $205,000 in back taxes. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
But, partly because the Clause has not yet been incorporated against the states, many states and cities are indeed levying excessive fines and forfeitures. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am
And, in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
On the federal level, the United States Supreme Court has held that a valid disclaimer does not defeat a federal tax lien levied under IRC § 6321, Dyre, Jr. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm
Nalwa v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
United States (Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes)United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
§ 292 and get half of any fines levied against the entity responsible for the false marking. (4) The other half of the fine goes to the United States government. (5) While § 292 only provides for a civil monetary fine, the fine is up to $500 per offense. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 7:03 pm
The Sixth Circuit dove into that surprisingly complicated question this week in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
On February 13, Akin Gump filed this Respondent’s brief in US v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:17 pm
Patry was employed in the United States Copyright Office in the Library of Congress and as Copyright Counsel to the US House of Representatives, Committee on Intellectual Property. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
Reagan National Advertising, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
