Search for: "United States v. Manning" Results 201 - 220 of 6,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2009, 6:17 am by stu@crimapp.com
Yesterday’s Washington Post reported that an Iowa Prosecutor filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court arguing that the constitution does not prohibit framing an innocent man and that prosecutors should be immune from suits by the victim of such framing. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
The United State Tax Court recently heard a case where a man supported his fiancé and her two children that he lived with and claimed head of household status. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:56 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
United States, 2009 WL 2386674 (9th Cir. 2009), in which (1) a man asked Larry Nunley to haul a... [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
In a move certain to make the No Man salivate like a Pavlovian dog, CAAF granted review of an Apprendi issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
A cert petition has been filed seeking review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:00 am by zshapiro
The Courts that have upheld warrantless GPS searches have cited the 1983 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:11 am
You can access today's ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:15 pm by Mridula Raman
If a federal district court orders a state to transport John the Tiger Man, then can the state immediately appeal that order? [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
Today's CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:11 pm
McAuliffe and his Sexual Predator Unit, which strengthens the State's ability to prosecute child pornography in the future. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
On Monday, it's the aura and majesty of the Supreme Court of the United States, descanting grandiloquently about issues of national importance.On Tuesday, it's the Appellate Court of Connecticut droning on about comment (k) to the Restatement.On this blog, you never know what you'll get.Bad news: It's Tuesday.In Breen v. [read post]