Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 201 - 220
of 9,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:01 am
McDonald's operates 14,500 restaurants in the United States and served 28 million customers per day. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
When the response was that all of this missed the point, missed the mark of what the decision-makers would focus on, the reply was “no way. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on August 26, 1910. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 17 (2005), quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:13 am
By Scott Bauer - This image was released by the Agricultural Research Service, the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, with the ID k7245-1 (next)., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php? [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
On Friday, November 13th, join judges, prosecutors, and attorneys as they convene to mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of Sheppard v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
On April 2, the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky issued an injunction preventing Diageo North America and Casa Cuervo from using a similar wax seal for tequilas sold in the US on the grounds that it would violate the trademark rights of Maker’s Mark, a unit of Fortune Brands. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:13 pm
Holmes of the United States Tax Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
William Conley held that the patent marking statute does not violate the "take care" clause of Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm
(Orin Kerr) If anything is clear from the Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), because a False Marking qui tam relator is not an inferior officer of the government, but rather, is an assignee of a revocable interest of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
