Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company"
Results 201 - 220
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2023, 2:57 am
United States The Ocean Shipping Reform Act 2022 (OSRA) came into force on 16 June 2022. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(The defendants were a British oil company, a Dutch oil company, and their Nigerian subsidiary.) [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm
***************************************** Despite the initial glee of the prospect of a United States that was independent of Middle East oil, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014, the price of oil started dropping precipitously. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said that the rule would decrease the United States’ vulnerability to “global shifts in the price of oil” and “reduce carbon emissions by 2.5 billion metric tons. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Here is the authors’ article. ************ INTRODUCTION While class actions in Europe may appear to in be in their infancy, especially in comparison to the United States, there have been many interesting developments in case law and legislation across Europe that will hopefully make it easier for investors to hold companies to account for failures to meet ESG-related standards. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm
In the United States, violence is committed against Indigenous women at disproportionately high rates. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am
Russia has also refused to pay an almost €2 billion judgment the court issued against it in the hyper-sensitive Yukos case, in which the court found numerous violations of the Convention in the use of various retroactive tax assessments to force Russia’s biggest private oil company into bankruptcy (leading to its subsequent fire sale to a state-owned company). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
This is well accepted in Canadian law, and indeed in the law of most countries, including that of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
<> Major-US-companies-facing-climate-change-related-risks-and-costs - Major U.S. public companies from all economic sectors now facing climate change related risks and costs, a new report from Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). . . a State-by-State analysis of the business response to climate change, shows companies across America are factoring global warming into their business planning because they see climate action as a prudent… [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:48 pm
Early v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
The court held the case for four months pending its decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management District (Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2d Dist. 2020) ____ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm
United States v. $184,505.01 in the United States Currency, 72 F.3d 1160 (3rd Cir. 1995)(original opinion (here)): this is an asset forfeiture case arising from an in rem proceeding against cash. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
This is the first Chancery decision that I personally recall which has specifically relied on the relatively new standard announced by the United States Supreme Court in the Twombly case, as the Delaware standard applicable to motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
Among other things, the companies own and operate coal-fired power plants in six states in the USA. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
