Search for: "V D" Results 201 - 220 of 76,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 1:56 am
SRM Global Master Fund LP v Commissioners of HM Treasury; RAB Special Situations (Master) Fund Ltd v Same; Grainger and others v Same [2009] EWHC 227 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 55 “Ss 5(4) and 9(2) of the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008 and art 6 of the Northern Rock plc Compensation Order 2008 (SI 2008/718), the [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Jones v Attrill; Hibberd v Michael Jane Hair & Beauty; Tankard v John Fredericks Plastics Ltd (Law Society intervening)[2008] EWCA Civ 1375; [2008] WLR (D) 383 “The purpose of reg 4(2)(e)(ii) of the Conditional Fee Agreement Regulations 2000 was to ensure that a solicitor acted and gave advice independently of his own interest. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
Although some of you thought that the trivia question below about D. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:42 am by scanner1
., d/b/a CBM COLLECTIONS, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:49 am
OQ (India) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (India) v Same [2009] WLR (D) 343 "Where a person, in reliance, inter alia, upon art 3(2) of the Citizen Directive, sought to claim a right of entry and residence as a dependant of a Union citizen, there was no requirement to ask [...] [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:47 am by sally
Burnip v Birmingham City Council and another (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening); Trengove v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council and another (Same intervening); Gorry v Wiltshire County Council and another (Same intervening) [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2012] WLR (D) 150 “The statutory criteria for calculating housing benefit for tenants in the private rented sector based on an entitlement to a one bedroom rate discriminated against the severely… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:59 am by traceydennis
Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13; [2010] WLR (D) 71 “An English court considering under Pt III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 whether it would be appropriate to make an order for financial relief on the application of a party to a foreign divorce was not required to apply a forum non conveniens test and decide which of two jurisdictions was the appropriate one. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Neilly v The Queen [2012] UKPC 12; [2012] WLR (D) 144 “When a defendant in a criminal trial had not been put on an identification parade, the decision as to whether to allow a dock identification was a matter for the trial judge in the light of all the relevant circumstances. [read post]