Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 201 - 220 of 780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2009) - Judgment Andrew Wood was an activist involved in the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT). [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm by Josh Blackman
Maybe a decade of serving with Judges Easterbrook and Wood would have had an impact on her. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
Where the SCCs are not complied with – or cannot be complied with – the national regulatory authorities must suspend or prohibit transfers and the Commission’s competence to draft SCCs does not restrict the powers of national authorities to review compliance in any way. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  But at this point, it is clear that advocates for unlimited corporate power hope and imagine that the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
"   Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. 02 Micro Int'l Ltd., No. 08-1128,  slip op. at 10  (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  When trimming a tree, a worker will use a wood chipper that be extremely dangerous. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  When trimming a tree, a worker will use a wood chipper that be extremely dangerous. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:12 pm by Nicki Milionis
The inquest, which commenced in September 2017, was concerned with the death of Captain David Wood (Captain Wood) in Antarctica on 11 January 2016. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:37 pm
Last week I posted on the Supreme Court's decision in Enquist v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I’d say it’s about power. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
During his tenure on the Court, Wilson wrote several landmark opinions, including one (Hayburn’s Case) affirming the power of judicial review and another (Chisholm v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:46 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's an excerpt from the Introduction to the article: Justice Breyer must either (a) grapple with the artificial question of what would constitute a judicial taking if there were such a thing as a judicial taking (reminiscent of the perplexing question how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?) [read post]