Search for: "Wood v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:48 am by Asbestos Litigation
It was as a unit integrating the scattered fragments of a buffer between the city and the whole palatal del Buen Retiro, by creating a space limited circoagonal and embellished by fountains and wooded pathways. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court.Pamela Wood reports for The Baltimore Sun that “[t]he Baltimore County government is asking the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:09 pm by Viking
  The interesting point is that in granting the third trial the appellate court relied on two cases, one of them being United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm by Karen Tani
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
 At the Conglomerate, Tamara Piety discusses the likely impact of Citizens United on a series of civil RICO cases filed by the United States against tobacco companies; petitions for certiorari in the case are currently before the Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:22 pm by Larry
United States, upset the normal course of classification by inserting considerations of use into the analysis of eo nomine tariff provisions.The case involves the tariff provisions for wood screws (7318.12) and for self-tapping screws (7318.14). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Herrera nor Indian law more broadly are out of the woods yet. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:46 am
" Additionally, Goodyear points out that the limitations period was not at issue in Bazemore because claims brought by the United States were not subject to section 706(e). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]