Search for: "mark"
Results 201 - 220
of 136,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2024, 3:30 am
"The post Fraud, Delays, and Nonsense (Marks) . . . [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:33 am
The first claimant is the registered proprietor of UK trade mark numbers, 1180215 (the "lozenge mark"), 2177779A (the "series mark") and [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
A key highlight thereof is that well-known trade mark owners can now file an application to include their mark on an elite list of such marks maintained by the Trade Marks Office. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
If I register German generic term A as a trade mark where it's not generic, eg Spain, in order secure registration of A.eu, but it is my intention to use the domain name A.eu in respect of the goods or services for which A is registered, have I used the mark?] [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:33 pm
All businesses have trade marks. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
Is trade mark law difficult? [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:17 pm
It will prevent others from registering your mark or a similar mark. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:42 am
[T]he false markings made by [defendants] appear to be nothing more than mistakes made by employees. . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:00 am
Pavement markings should not be confusing. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:41 pm
Read the Readiness Subcommittee Mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 12:21 am
The Trade Mark Office has been given an extensive discretion not to grant a trade mark registration that is filed in “bad faith”. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
lozenge shape mark at issueThe German Federal Court of Justice once again confirmed its reputation for being the most shape mark friendly court in Europe. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:39 am
One simply cannot register a trade-mark that is descriptive. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 11:00 pm
What do you think of non-traditional marks? [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
For the Second Circuit, using a competitor’s mark as a mark is not the same as use of a mark in commerce. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
Section 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 requires (at least for now) that a trade mark applicant must state its good faith intention to use the mark applied for. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:30 am
This legal perspective concludes on a happier note, explaining how the literary “Mark Twain” has succeeded in the twenty-first century, well beyond his death in 1910. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
Monster Energy asserted as well that “MONSTER” was a well-known trade mark belonging to it (under sections 8(4)(b)(i) and 8(4)(b(ii)(A) of the Trade Marks Act) and that there was passing off (under section 8(7)(a) of the Trade Marks Act).Monster Energy took the position that Glamco’s trade mark “SWEET MONSTER” should not be registered due to its similarity to Monster Energy’s trade mark “MONSTER”. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
(2) May the principles laid down by [the CJEU] regarding the genuine use of a Community trade mark be applied in the context of the territorial criteria used when examining the reputation of such a mark? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Confusion was likely, but did Opposer have priority based on use of its mark, or had Opposer's mark been abandoned, as Applicant contended? [read post]
