Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 2181 - 2200 of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Mahmoud and Jackson argue that this conduct violates: Section 1692e(2), which prohibits "false[ly] represent[ing] . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt"; Section 1692e(5), which prohibits "threat[ening] to take any action that cannot legally be taken"; Section 1692e(10), which prohibits "us[ing] . . . false representation[s] or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am by Charon QC
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:55 am by Jack D
–> La CNIL poursuit ses efforts pour être présente sur l’ensemble du territoire national afin de vérifier la correcte application de la loi par les responsables de fichiers, où qu’ils se trouvent. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:50 am by Steven M. Gursten
” Notably, the Notice and Order of Prohibition was a direct response to the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in Rory v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am by Charon QC
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:46 pm
Whether Congress has the power to ban possession and distribution of images of animal cruelty, such as pit bull fights. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm by Eric
Another Kozinski bull-in-the-china-shop opinion, it is studded with important legal statements. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Maurizio Borghi
by Maurizio Borghi Patents Court London, 12 January 2012, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & Nicholas John Houghton. [read post]