Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 2181 - 2200 of 31,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:51 am by Ted Frank
It will be open season on cars given that car thieves ("nonviolent offenders") will never go to prison no matter how many times they are caught.'" [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:38 am
Teleflex, the court said that patent examiners and judges need to look broadly at how creative people normally combine ideas to solve problems instead of relying on narrow, rigid tests to determine whether an innovation is worthy of a patent monopoly. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
Setting the Agenda for Scholarship on Election ReformPart V: Changing the Institutional Terrain During the last few days (here, here, here, and here), I have tried to sketch what I think ought to be on the agenda of academics and reformers interested in changing how our election system is run. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am by MBettman
It is not the job of teachers (notwithstanding the mandatory abuse reporting requirements) to dig up evidence to prosecute people. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:14 am by Vincent LoTempio
“Why would people even bother coming up with new ideas and ways of doing business if it’s just going to be stolen from them? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:58 am by Venkat
(During oral argument (which is well worth a listen and which you can access here), one of the judges asked whether plaintiffs counsel "[had] any idea how many of the 97,000 people have suffered identity theft that's traceable to this [incident] . . . [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm by Bridget Crawford
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 9:09 am
Over at Volokh, Prawfsblawg, and California Appellate Report, they're discussing People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:44 pm by John Gregory
The Ontario Divisional Court is going to hear an appeal of the Warman v Wilkins-Fournier case, in which the issue is whether an internet intermediary (here a blog site) must disclose the names of people alleged to have defamed someone. [read post]