Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 Thompkins habeas petition was denied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (in Detroit).In a remarkable opinion from the United States 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Thompkins' conviction was reversed. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Thompkins habeas petition was denied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (in Detroit).In a remarkable opinion from the United States 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Thompkins' conviction was reversed. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court reasoned that "[a] process that accords no significance to relevant facets of the character and record of the individual offender … excludes from consideration in fixing the ultimate punishment of death the possibility of compassionate or mitigating factors stemming from the diverse frailties of humankind. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm by Laura C. Baucus and Erin A. Sedmak
In 2016, the plaintiffs, political and nonprofit organizations, filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, claiming that the TCPA (§227(b)(1)(A)(iii)) violated the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 8:52 am by Lee E. Berlik
However, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia, recently held otherwise. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:58 pm by Grimes Teich Anderson LLP
To learn more about product liability and car accident claims in Western North Carolina and Upstate South Carolina, contact the experienced personal injury attorneys of Grimes Teich Anderson LLP. [read post]