Search for: "White v. United States" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Lisa Soronen discusses the decision at the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, as does Ellen Podgor at the White Collar Crime Prof Blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Platforms can take down white male supremacist content without worrying that they will be sued in the United States—because of clear protections offered in Section 230. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:56 am
  One has red, white, and blue stripes and states in large block type: “IN GOD WE TRUST”; “ONE NATION UNDER GOD”; “GOD BLESS AMERICA”; and, “GOD SHED HIS GRACE ON THEE. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968), where the Supreme Court said that impermissibly suggestive photo arrays are unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Ayestas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Alex R. McQuade
Benjamin Wittes outlined why Donald Trump is a national security threat to the United States of America. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
Banks also recently wrote an essay for Stanford Lawyer about the unanimous decision, which held that state-mandated segregation of public schools violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]