Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 2201 - 2220
of 3,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm
Citizens United is unlikely to settle the question, given how sharply the four dissenters and many outside commentators have disagreed with the majority. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
After Citizens United they went through denial and anger. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
This paper explores that relationship in the S&P 500 to predict the effect of Citizens United on shareholder wealth. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
The four Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
Citizens United functions not only as a precedent in Janus, but as a kind of meta-precedent: since Citizens United also overruled a prior case that rested on a more egalitarian constitutional political economy, Justice Alito in Janus uses Citizens United as a kind of blueprint for how you use the First Amendment to reverse old Court doctrine that is insufficiently libertarian in its political-economic orientation.In the most interesting and… [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am
Indeed, consider Justice Stevens' dissent (for four Justices) in Citizens United. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:22 am
House Panel Opens Investigation into 38 Studios Loan” by Katherine Gregg for Providence Journal Campaign Finance “Is There a Silver Lining to Citizens United? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:10 pm
Swanson had two holdings: (1) the state ban on corporate contributions to candidates remains constitutional even after Citizens United and (2) the state’s rules for disclosure of certain political activity are constitutional. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:57 am
” Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston “looks at Bernie Sanders’s desire to banish the Citizens United decision, and the constitutional barriers in the way. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
(Independent expenditures, whether by individuals or corporations, do not implicate this interest because of the supposed lack of an apparent quid pro quo—at least according to the Supreme Court.)In Citizen United, the Supreme Court struck down limitations on the ability of corporations and labor unions to make certain independent expenditures to candidates for federal office. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:25 pm
DeStefano (April 25, 2009) Kagan to Split Time with Waxman in Citizens United (July 24, 2009) [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:39 pm
Big bucks: Super PACs and nonprofits unleashed by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision have spent more than $840 million on the 2012 election, with the overwhelming majority favoring Republicans, particularly GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 8:54 am
You can also appreciate the importance of the final three opinions, which will be released tomorrow, because 7 out of the 39 advocates (Kneedler, Stewart, Underwood, Olson, Waxman, Coleman, Meade) listed argued in one of the three cases and Malcolm Stewart actually argued in two (Citizens United and Cuomo). [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
The Court did permit same-day release of its hearing last Sept. 9 in the major campaign finance case, Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:59 am
Carhart; in the area of campaign finance, where the Citizens United decision partially overruled McConnell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
This was a pure application of the principle in the Citizens United case. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced a potential agreement crafted in response to Citizens United. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:14 am
Supreme Court's landmark Citizens United decision in 2010, laws prohibited companies from using corporate money to persuade employees to vote for particular candidates. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
