Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C."
Results 2201 - 2220
of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
(c) The date of termination. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:38 am
’ C. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 12:33 pm
Publica resultados originales e inéditos de investigaciones jurídicas en idioma español e inglés, bajo estándares de publicación normalizados internacionalmente. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
“Just moments ago, you testified under oath that (whatever the contradiction is)” “At this time, I’d like to submit the transcript from the deposition as (Petitioner/Respondent’s) Exhibit X” You don’t need to submit a transcript of the prior inconsistent and sworn statement…but it’s pretty devastating when you do. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
B. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
& Care Home v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:09 am
Es un honor para mi presentarles el primer autor invitado de DIPr Argentina e inaugurar asàesta nueva sección del blog. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
It isn’t always the case that in the long run, there’s still time to change the road you’re on. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
It isn’t always the case that in the long run, there’s still time to change the road you’re on. [read post]
9 May 2010, 1:31 pm
It isn’t always the case that in the long run, there’s still time to change the road you’re on. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:05 am
El desconocimiento de las técnicas básicas de negociación puede llevar a algunos "cobradores" a utilizar métodos que rozan la ilegalidad. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
OPINION EVELYN V. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:28 am
Em linguagem didática, a proposta é tornar eletrônicas todas as fases ou momentos do processo: (a) o peticionamento, (b) a tramitação, (c) as comunicações e (d) a finalização. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
See, e.g., In re Le Nature’s Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 4:13 am
º 3014 y 3018/1995, siendo ponente D. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:36 am
Under the Fifth Circuit’s formulation of this test [other jurisdictions have somewhat different standards], the court is to evaluate five non-exhaustive factors: a) the degree of control exercised by the alleged employer; b) the extent of the relative investments of the worker and the alleged employer; c) the degree to which the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss is determined by the alleged employer; d) the skill and initiative required… [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 5:53 pm
Deberá permitirse a las personas presentes en la ejecución de una petición, llevar un registro al pie de la letra de los procesos pudiendo usar medios técnicos para efectuar dicho registro al pie de la letra. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The Open Access to Courts Act (H.R. 4115) would provide: A court shall not dismiss a complaint under subdivision (b)(6), (c) or (e) of Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim which would entitle the plaintiff to relief. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:36 am
Pronouncing the English alphabet: I used to get students to write the letters in groups according to the vowel sound, like this (this presumes the British pronunciation of Z as zed - if it is pronounced zee, it goes in the second line instead: A H J K B C D E G P T V F L M N S X Z I Y O Q U W R Many thanks to Martina for this report. [read post]
