Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 2201 - 2220 of 6,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
Five years later, in 2014, a group of Uighur separatists initiated an attack at the Kunming railway station, stabbing 33 civilians. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:21 am by Bob Kraft
Department of Energy (DOE), as a rule of thumb, you can assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 mph will cost you 7 percent more for gasoline. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although Quebec has a long history of invoking s. 33 as a form of protest to the creation of the Charter, this ended in 1987 and it has been used much more sparingly since. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 (Para 33).A venue can become a seat if one of the conditions precedent is satisfied and does not assume the status of seat. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am by Woodrow Pollack
Inc., 524 F.3d 1229, 1232–33 (11th Cir. 2008) (announcing standard of review for facial subject matter jurisdiction attacks where the defendant does not use material extrinsic to the pleadings). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am by Woodrow Pollack
Inc., 524 F.3d 1229, 1232–33 (11th Cir. 2008) (announcing standard of review for facial subject matter jurisdiction attacks where the defendant does not use material extrinsic to the pleadings). [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The mere presence of a drug in the sample does not constitute sufficient evidence to charge a person as being impaired by a drug. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:04 pm by Thomas Schober
It should be noted, however, that the GDPR does not apply to processing data “for a purely personal or household activity and thus with no connection to a professional or commercial activity. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:04 pm by Thomas Schober
It should be noted, however, that the GDPR does not apply to processing data “for a purely personal or household activity and thus with no connection to a professional or commercial activity. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Still, it does happen and is often newsworthy when it does. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 12:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Figure 12 clearly illustrates that in the present application the term "audience size" has its normal meaning.2.5 However, in claim 1 the phrase "updating the audience size information ... in response to said receiving [of playback indications]" does not imply any particular technical manner of determining the number of viewers taking into account the received indications. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Consider the spectacle of having anti-tobacco activists and tobacco plaintiffs’ expert witnesses assert that the American Law Institute had an ethical problem because Institute members included some tobacco defense lawyers.1 Somehow these authors overlooked their own positional and financial conflicts, as well as the obvious fact that the Institute’s members included some tobacco plaintiffs’ lawyers. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
  We also understood we were many and that we might not like each other or each other’s practices very much sometimes.[1]  We also understood how everyone else saw us. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am by Jessica Kroeze
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 4:45 pm by Kevin
There we learn, among other things, that the California Constitution of 1879 “defines all California courts to be courts of record,” which it probably does, but that doesn’t seem especially relevant. [read post]