Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2201 - 2220 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by Justine Moller
Small-scale mining relates to mining over an area covering a minimum of three cadastre units and not exceeding 120 cadastre units. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
In addition, access to counsel was far more difficult from Mexico than it is in the United States, where accessing counsel is difficult enough. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
Section 271(f) allows the holder of a U.S. patent to block the export from the United States of components that can be assembled abroad to produce an infringing product, even though the patent is not enforceable in the place where that assembly takes place. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
Holder, 11-702, which appears to raise the same question. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am by Naomi Jane Gray
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am by Naomi Jane Gray
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
This action only dealt with benefits for gay and lesbian federal workers and their families, but government agencies that carry out some 1,100 federal laws and scores of official regulations dealing with marital benefits and opportunities also are expected to begin taking steps to implement the Court’s ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:22 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
March 24, 2009: The Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, and oral arguments begin in Citizens United v. [read post]