Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2201 - 2220 of 3,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm by Juliana
In the appointment letter, Kosinki designates Burns to “perform the duties of United States District Judge temporarily for the District of Arizona for the specific case United States of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
  The patent system of the United States is internationally recognized as the world's strongest form of intellectual property protection. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, 13-449, a high-visibility dispute between the national Episcopal Church and a portion of a former congregation over who gets to open a Quizno’s in an especially prime location. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:03 am
The roundtable discussion was on the recent decisions of Nigeria’s Supreme Court (SC) in Adeokin v MCSN and Compact Disc v MCSN on the locus standi (right of action) of collective management organisations (CMOs) under the Nigerian Copyright Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Edith Roberts
Totenberg alluded to a recent interview in which Ginsburg opined that the United States was not “experiencing the best of times. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
It was primarily raised by the United States, acting as amicus curiae. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
While the latest version also does not apply to “lawfully present” immigrants, a prior draft only excepted valid visa holders, which would have barred most refugees, asylees, and asylum seekers, all of whom are authorized to live and work in the United States, from renting business space. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:53 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Under the so-called “waiver doctrine” of the “law-of-the-case doctrine,” an issue that a party could have raised in an earlier appeal in the case, but that was not raised, is barred from consideration (see United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]