Search for: "In Re Moore"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 2,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
For there is no indication that this doubling of computational power (Moore’s law), the doubling of storage capacity or the doubling of communication capability – each occurring in 18 months or less – is about to slow down in the next couple of years. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
Tort law has the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Id. citing In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Well, if you're going to have to use the Sleekcraft test to evaluate likely confusion, exactly what work does the initial interest confusion doctrine do? [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
So they're willing to say that it was worth multimillion [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Milligan and Moore v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Blawg Review #304—The "Spooked by Nukes" Edition ~~~ "A nuclear era, but I have no fear.... [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Who do you think they’re going to vote for? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
ISOC keeps the standards alive, flexible, and responsive to new opportunities for expansion and reinvention made possible through the agency of Moore’s Law, which continues to drive the basic technological components of digital life into the uncharted realm of the faster, cheaper, and smaller. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
”) In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-7369 (Kennedy, J., concurring in the judgment) (In a prior juvenile case involving a juvenile’s admission of guilt, Justice Kennedy applied criminal plain-error to a mutual mistake of law, which caused a “manifest injustice,” without considering whether this error was outcome determinative.) [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Bornhorst Northern District of Ohio at AkronKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
In re Copps Chapel Methodist Episcopal Church, 120 Ohio St. 309, 310 (1929). [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:26 am
Moreover, they face stiff criminal penalties if they try to re-enter illegally after being ordered removed. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In the Courts On Monday 12 March 2012, Eady J concluded the hearing of the second application to re-amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspapers. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Putting together a list of all law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
They're arguing that Discover not only doesn't have to pay Morgan Stanley its share of the settlement but that Morgan Stanley owes Discover damages for its interference in the antitrust case. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
David Boundy This is a response to Prof. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:18 am
Next year, and we’re all done with the peaking. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-293 Issue: Whether a litigant moving to re-open a suppression hearing to introduce additional evidence must justify his failure to introduce that evidence at the initial hearing. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Lafon Eastern District of Tennessee at KnoxvilleKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
