Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 1:23 pm by Michael Ehline
A driver who decides to take a sharp turn may not be aware of the motorcyclist right next to their car. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Specifically, the SPA states that there were two classes of shares: voting shares and non-voting shares. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am by Karina Lytvynska
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Sharpe, citing Justice Cardozo in the 1937 American case of Palko v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]