Search for: "State v. Akins"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 2,748
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
Mittal: Akin to Lochnerism, but not really my concern here. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
Similarly, in Printz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
As New York's highest court stated in Wildenstein & Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
The case, Secretary of State for the Home Department v David Davis MP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 1185, has recently been referred by the Court of Appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union where the court asks the CJEU to rule on whether the ground-breaking case of Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources & Others, the case which ruled that European data retention laws were incompatible with Articles 7 & 8 of… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:21 am
" Additionally, Healy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:25 am
In addressing the first criteria the CJEU stated that the "act of communication" is to be construed broadly and making a hyperlink available, even if the user does not click on it, is itself an act of communication.In addressing the second criteria, the CJEU stated that term "public" means an indeterminate and fairly large number of potential recipients. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:03 am
See Quinn v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
As it happens, I have always been a doubter about the wisdom of courts automatically giving state employees outside the civil service system tenure rights akin to the civil service. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
These are the same questions at issue in Kirby v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:21 am
In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
Van-Herpen v Green & Green. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm
The SCC also clearly stated in the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am
v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Manchin’s family business stood to benefit financially when it was reclassified as something akin to solar, wind, and hydropower. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
