Search for: "United States v. California" Results 2201 - 2220 of 12,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 22, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
  Or, at a minimum, explain why it comes out 180 degrees differently than the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Nov. 18, 2022), the Honorable James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss claims brought against defendants Coca-Cola, Blue Triton Brands, and Niagara Bottling (collectively the “Defendants”) by plaintiff individuals and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Interpreter fees are addressed in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 9795.3. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:32 am by Steven Cohen
Home Depot USA, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Central District of California – July 20th. 2018) involves a claim of strict product liability and negligence against the defendants related to a fire that broke out in the plaintiff’s garage. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Sharp–(32 Cal. 2d 711)–Decided at the Supreme Court of California, this becomes the first case to find that anti-miscegenation laws in the United States were a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am by Sara Thorpe
Co. of State of Pa., __ Cal.4th __ (2010) (2010 Cal.Lexis 11679), the California Supreme Court held that where the insurance policies did not define the term “suit,” there was a duty to defend and indemnify a contractor that settled a government claim in an administrative adjudicative proceeding before the United States Department of Interior Board of Contract Appeals (“IBCA”). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:27 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California said at the outset of today's Epic Games v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am by Andrew Frisch
Concepcion There has long been talk of the pr0-business conservative majority that currently comprises the United State’s Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Republicans’ refusal to pass budgets almost destroyed the California state government, at one point even preventing the state from issuing checks and requiring that temporary IOU vouchers be substituted to pay state employees and contractors. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:36 am by Jim Singer
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of California could, if upheld, significantly limit companies’ ability to transfer its proprietary software unless the company has obtained an assignment from each and every developer. [read post]