Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Moreover, it cites cases as far back as the 1800s, including Merrill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
Bush would simply name someone far worse--and one can easily think of people who are worse that Mukasey--to a recess appointment. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
So, when I read Pouncil v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
When the rider is wearing a helmet, that outer shell can help prevent minor punctures from sharp objects, such as rocks and branches. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:11 am
’ and ‘Have prior executive branch policy statements on SEPs been used by courts, other authorities, or in licensing negotiations? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:27 am
All three non-partisan, not-for-profit organizations say that a battle of “David v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:37 pm
., People v Freeland, 36 NY2d 518, 525 [1975].) [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
Box 4210 Helena, MT 59604-4210 Phone: (406) 444-2590 (V/TTY); (877) 296-1197 (Toll Free) Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing or Deaf-Blind Montana Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services (MDHHS) 3911 Central Avenue P.O. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
In 2008, a divided Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
Love it or hate it, a lot of people rely on it. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:26 am
Reverse Roe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
’ Decisions about policies to address climate change must be made by the elected branches of government. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court this term, Gundy v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
EXECUTIVE BRANCH Executive Office of the President ............................ [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
" Congress also has the power to investigate the workings of the Executive branch simply to determine whether legislative amendments are necessary in order prevent or deter undesirable government practices, and perhaps even for the basic function of facilitating "the American people's ability to reconstruct and come to terms with their history," Nixon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
" Nor does our government's unanimous condemnation of torture answer this concern, since where to draw that line is the subject of acrimonious debate between the executive and legislative branches. [read post]
