Search for: "Redding v. Redding"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 7,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 3:47 pm
The case, Kellar v. [read post]
State v. Cain and State v. Simms – NJ Supreme Court Reaffirms the Role of the Jury as Trier of Facts
3 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
A red car then parked in front of the silver car. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:56 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:03 pm
The case in question is Case C-119/10 Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
It's going to come down to a variety of factors such as the prominence of the name on the merchandise, consumer motivation for purchasing (Reds fan vs. baseball history fan), and issues similar to those raised in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm
She had stopped for a red traffic light, and was just beginning to move forward slowly toward the congested intersection when her car was hit. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:01 pm
The efficiency gap was presented to the courts in Gill v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:31 am
In Sorel v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
In Viacom Int'l v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:17 pm
In Safford v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:31 pm
Redding-US Supreme Court NO STRIP SEARCHES OF JUVENILE? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:29 am
The appeal is from a $30 million judgment against the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians in favor of a developer of a gaming facility that failed in the 1990s, before the Tribe partnered with a new developer and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to open the existing Red Hawk Casino. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
If enacted, rules outlined in the “Issues Paper” will have many deleterious effects: The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established in In Bates v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:21 am
However, when it came to the analysis of substantiality, the judge made no consideration of whether the blue/yellow combination was a substantial part of the combination of text (Lidl), colours (blue, red and yellow) and shapes (square, circle and open circle) which gave the work its originality. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
The post Senator Sasse on Pluralists v. [read post]
