Search for: "U. S. Appeal of" Results 2221 - 2240 of 6,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Kobayashi writes The Sticky Wicket That Is Home Health Care: Why It’s a Hotly Contested Issue in the Workers’ Compensation Arena   The article, found here, asks, “An injured employee’s entitlement to home health care is oftentimes a hotly contested issue in the workers’ compensation arena. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:40 am by Ryan Cagle
Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced the launch of a permanent Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) program with the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:37 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Under current law, Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 203E, Section 602, a trust is presumed to be revocable and amendable “[u]nless the terms of a trust expressly provide that the trust is irrevocable. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by Melissa Raphan
 The district court granted summary judgment in favor of UPS and the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The decisions by Judge Kornreich were before the Appellate Division when Schindler appealed and it is clear from Judge Richter’s decision that the Appellate Division rejected all of Schindler’s explanations and defenses for why he failed to provide discovery. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The decisions by Judge Kornreich were before the Appellate Division when Schindler appealed and it is clear from Judge Richter’s  decision that the Appellate Division rejected all of Schindler’s explanations and defenses for why he failed to provide discovery. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am by Liskow & Lewis
  Therefore, the Court of Appeals reversed Citgo’s CAA convictions. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 3:36 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The appeals court majority determined the INA’s use of the phrase “lawfully admitted” for “permanent residence” had “nothing to do with ‘admission’ at all. [read post]