Search for: "United States v. Judge" Results 2221 - 2240 of 31,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Jon Sands
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) ---  In Setser v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
District Judge, Nebraska, who cited a legal blog in his opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Ted Frank
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am by Zachary Spilman
”  (Dissent op. at 2) (citing United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:00 am by Dale B. Halling
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]