Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 2221 - 2240 of 28,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
Judge Tallman begins this opinion with the line:  "The United States Constitution and federal law require that crimes be prosecuted where the offense was committed. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:15 pm by WIMS
APPS goes further and specifically applies the provisions of Annex V to U.S. navigable waters as well as all other waters and vessels over which the United States has jurisdiction, including U.S. vessels in U.S. internal waters. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1316, [2003] UKHRR 76.Whether the US government will play ball is, of course, another matter entirely.How interesting to see that Guantánamo Bay leads to so much litigation even in countries other than the United States.The courts of the United States, in turn, would do well to note that their decisions are closely watched by many other judges around the world. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:57 pm by Sex Crimes
The Wall Street Journal is running an excellent editorial discussing United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm
In a well-coordinated move, Christ Church in Savannah, Georgia and Bishop Seabury Church in Groton, Connecticut have each filed a petition for review of the decisions in their respective cases by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:08 am by Seth Borden
The United States Supreme Court today handed down its long-awaited decision in New Process Steel L.P. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 1:40 pm
The Court of Appeals held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Brown, quoting its prior decision in United States v. [read post]