Search for: "Deal v. State" Results 2241 - 2260 of 26,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Michael Sherman
In PJC, PJC invested in a chain of pharmacies in the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Such laws have withstood judicial challenge in large part because Congress has granted states the authority to impose such restrictions—to effectively legislate their own foreign policy in this narrow lane.[4]  However, as of yet, Congress has not authorized the same powers to states regarding dealings with China or some of the other foreign states that these bills frequently address, such as Russia, Venezuela, and others. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Fenix profited from sales of the video footage that Romelus posted on OnlyFans Both Charles and Romelus were criminally prosecuted and took plea deals that (surprisingly) avoided jailtime. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Canadian fair dealing user’s right has some superficial similarities to the United States fair use exemption. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Venkat
We’ve blogged a bunch about the threat cases, and the First Amendment has established case law dealing with threats. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:14 am by admin
So instead of dealing with the attorney directly, you are still dealing with the collection agency who is dealing with the attorney. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The mosque had aroused a great deal of public opposition; the county planning authorities nonetheless granted the necessary building permits; but a state court ruled that the county hadn’t given sufficient notice to the public about its meetings, given the heightened public interest in the mosque. [read post]