Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
Small rights holders constantly say that federal litigation is incredibly costly, discovery is monumental, the whole process is way too expensive and unaffordable to the most vulnerable participants: small rights holders are priced out of the market. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
(Grover v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:39 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:27 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
The court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
USDA v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Holder (1964) 379 US 104, 118. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Estate of Michael Heiser v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:24 am
”Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Holder v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Thank you.Declaration of Copyright Self-Regulation of the Chinese Internet SectorIn order to safeguard copyright and related right holders' lawful rights and interest, stimulate the healthy development of the Internet industry, safeguard social and public interests, the representatives of the Internet sector make the following declaration of self-regulation to society:I, Internet enterprises shall undertake their obligations to society, earnestly respect and propagate State… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Mellon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Wiggins v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:26 am
Previously Posted: On October 27, 2010 the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Hurtado v Holder, affirmed the trial court's denial of habeas relief. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The CJEU noted that, if found otherwise, this would lead to an "absurd result": the subsequent registration of a design, obtained despite the earlier disclosure of an identical design intended to be incorporated in or applied to a different product, would allow the holder of the subsequent registration to prohibit the use of the same design for the product, which was the subject of the earlier disclosure.Nintendo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 7:02 am
The law excludes persons and entities that are subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am
Germany is the world's most popular patent litigation venue, and last week's legislative decision does nothing to dissuade patent holders from enforcing their intellectual property rights in the largest EU member state. [read post]
