Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 2241 - 2260 of 2,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm by Tung Yin
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:20 pm by Floyd J. Dugas
  The statute applies retroactively back to May 27, 2007.The Ledbetter Act was passed in direct response to the United States Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 am
That's at least part of the lesson from the North Carolina Court of Appeals last week in Commercial Credit Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
According to Skilling, the 5th Circuit rejected this theory following his conviction in the case US v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:18 am
Complaint, State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In cases involving prisoners held without charge at the American naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and the mentally retarded on death row, his version of American justice propelled by common sense and moral clarity commanded a majority.In perhaps the most significant case, Hamdan. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP:JUR) Overheated dairy warriors back in court: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) The lady vanishes: the case of the disappearing debutante - IP Minister Baroness Wilcox (IPKat) INTELLIGENT SENSOR: a borderline rejection (Class 46) Sir Robin Jacob – Sir Hugh Laddie Chair in Intellectual Property Law, University College London (Spicy IP) (IPKat)     United States US General US ITC holds second unnecessary hearing on China IP (China… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Avoid swallowing lake or pool water while swimming, especially pool water in public swimming facilities. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Avoid swallowing lake or pool water while swimming, especially pool water in public swimming facilities. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by JB
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]