Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am
Proactive obligations of this kind raise serious questions about a state’s compliance with human rights law, due to the high risk that in their efforts to determine whether user content is legal or illegal, platforms will end up taking down users’ legitimate speech at scale. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
As I become aware of people doing these things, I confront them and shut them down. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
The idea of pirates, smugglers, and privateers in the twenty-first century is absurd to most people, including many attorneys. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The invention of the printing press allowed the dissemination of speech on a grand scale. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
To do so they attempt to distinguish Miami Herald v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
[W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
An epilogue discusses music; the authors suggest that music is transforming, not dying, with money shifting to touring and other forms of production that don’t rely on large-scale record sales. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
Or consider Celaya v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
Woloszyn said the two vibrios (V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii) are major causes of larval shellfish mortality, which results in increased costs to the aquaculture industry and consumer. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
In the last thirty years, legal formants and legal narratives produced in core countries according to capitalistic economic needs have been detached from their own background and moved upward to a global scale, so to constitute a new global economic order, a law-non-law with no clear source nor geographical location, which is however territorialized any time it is respected and or coercively enforced. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:07 am
" Jian Zhang v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
There, a lack of proper oversight and transparency nearly led to the collapse of the financial markets and a full-scale Depression. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
Adam Scales is also expressly quoted as someone who opposes any such expurgation policy. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
Exclusion of African-Americans from whatever economic opportunity structure was enjoyed by white people offended our constitutional commitments in a way that defects in that opportunity structure itself did not. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
