Search for: "United States v. Olds" Results 2241 - 2260 of 8,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General stated that ‘an economic operator must be considered a single unit…[and] not be dissected on the basis of its individual activities related to processing of personal data’. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:25 pm
The 3rd Circuit repeatedly struck down the statute and the United States Supreme Court has finally put the 1998 Act out of its misery. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm by Bexis
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Through one of his corporate entities, Rooks purchased an old school building on Broadway Street in Grand Rapids. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am by Dennis Crouch
… It is inappropriate to dissect the claims into old and new elements and then to ignore the presence of the old elements in the analysis. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 6:00 am by Karen Olson
United States, the court held that expert testimony is admissible when the technique or theory it is based on has gained "general acceptance" in the relevant scientific community. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:30 pm by Patrick Bracher
The proper defendant should have been Google LLC located in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 6:10 am by alysondrake
She ran for President of the United States in 1884 and 1888 for a third party. [read post]